Jump to Navigation

Oklahoma Personal Injury Lawyer Blog

Proposed Law Could Limit Divorce Options...

As the divorce rate in Oklahoma and the rest of the country continues to rise, lawmakers are beginning to seriously consider options to curtail the trend. Oklahoma State Representative Sally Kern has introduced a measure to restrict options in certain circumstances. The bill proposes eliminating the ability to obtain a divorce on grounds of incompatibility when there are minor children in the marriage, the parties have been married for at least 10 years or either party formally objects to ending the marriage.

Traditional reasons for getting divorced are for domestic violence, abandonment, infidelity and fraudulent inducement among several others. When a person wants to end a marriage, this is usually the real reason. However, most people don't actually get divorced on these grounds. The explanation for this is fairly straightforward. Although admittedly it is different in several respects, a filing for the dissolution of a marriage is still a lawsuit. This means that for the plaintiff to gain the result they seek, being granted the divorce, he or she will have the burden to prove the allegations. If the claims upon which the divorce is being sought are not proven, then it may not be granted.

This can result some perverse outcomes. Take this example: A man cheats on his wife. The wife finds out and wants to end the marriage because of the affair. If she is unable to prove the affair occurred and that she had not consented to it in some way, the divorce may not be granted. Thus, the couple has to stay married even though they probably don't want to! Because of this problem, courts many decades ago began to grant divorces on grounds of incompatibility. That way there was nothing to prove and two people who don't want to live together don't have to.

The proposed legislation would hamper this practice by adding hurdles if a couple wants to divorce on incompatibility grounds. This is a complicated and emotional issue which deserves much thought and debate. Many believe it would be a good thing for the divorce rate to drop. However, do we really want the government to tell us that we can or cannot contract to marry or end that marriage as we please? How then, can society protect children from the harmful effects of split families? What interest is most important: that of the government to keep the divorce rate down, that of the parents who are adults and in most cases should be free to make their own choices or that of the children who are the innocent victims in all of this?

While the answers to these difficult questions are elusive and complex, it is important to know the options available to you, which can vary greatly depending on your unique circumstances. If you have questions concerning a family matter, our experienced family law attorneys would be happy to assist you.

Cody's Law Finally Closes the Door on "Social Hosting"

"Social Hosting" is now on the books: It is illegal to supply underage persons with alcohol or illegal narcotics on your property. While this seems like a no-brainer, in 2004 when Cody Ryan Greenhaw died at the age of 16 from an alcohol and drug overdose while at a friends house, there was no law, no criminal investigation and no one was punished. Since that time, Cody's mother has been pressuring state legislators to take action. Finally, in May of 2011, Governor Mary Fallin signed into law House Bill 1211 or "Cody's Law."

The measure, which went into effect November 1, 2011, states that no person shall knowingly or willfully permit another person who is an invitee under the age of 21 to possess or consume alcohol or any controlled dangerous substance or any combination thereof. There are several things to note here that on the surface may not be plainly understood. First, the law not only refers to adults, but also expressly prohibits any person from engaging in "social hosting. " This may mean that minors may be liable for a violation of the new rule as well. How far state legislators intended to reach when they decided to use the word person will have be decided in the future. For now, just understand that the statute apparently authorizes the legal consequences to extend beyond any parents that may be involved.

Also worth pointing out, the individual under 21 must be an invitee of the host. This is an old legal term that differentiates between visiting friends, business patrons and intruders. An illustration of an invitee is a friend you have invited over. While this may seem like common sense, as with all legal expressions, it carries varying features and qualifications that can make it more complicated. For example, a friend you invited over for coffee may be an invitee at first, but if that person stays longer than you intended or wanders around your house where you haven't given them permission to go, their legal status as an invitee may have changed.

Penalties under the new measure are on a sliding scale. For a first offense, the maximum punishment is a misdemeanor conviction along with a fine of up to $500. A second violation within 10 years of the first can carry with it another misdemeanor conviction and up to $1,000 in fines. If convicted more than twice within 10 years, the offender may be found guilty of a felony and could face fines of not more than $2,500 or imprisonment for up to 5 years or both. Additional consequences may be had in the event an individual is hurt as a result of "social hosting."

Oklahoma Tort Reform: Who Does it Really Protect?

The Oklahoma legislature recently passed a series of three new measures that will significantly affect personal injury claims for state citizens. Two Senate Bills and one House Bill have been signed into law to provide the most sweeping tort reform regulations in recent years. But while these changes are billed as good for the state, applying them in individual cases could severely hamper one's ability to be made whole again.

First, what on earth is a tort and does it come with a side of ice cream? A tort comes from the French word for "wrong." It refers to a civil wrongful act, either intentional or accidental, which results in an injury to another. A tort may very well constitute a crime as well. However, while a crime is pursued by the state against the wrongdoer, a tort claim is pursued by the injured party in order to recover compensation from damages due to his or her injury.

While the new reforms alter multiple areas of the existing law, these are some of the major changes (and potential problems) that are most likely to affect you:

· The biggest change, and the one you may have heard about, limits the amount of "non-economic" damages one may recover. Hospital bills, lost wages from missing work-these are referred to as "economic" damages. "Non-economic" damages include pain and suffering and any amount the jury wishes to award the claimant to punish the wrongdoer and ensure that they are more careful in the future. While both of these figures have traditionally been left up to the judgment of the jury, now a person, regardless of how horrible or painful their injuries are, may not recover more than $350,000, even if the insurance policy of the wrongdoer is well above this amount.

· Another change provides that the jury will be instructed that all awards are not taxable. This is intended to keep juries from overcompensating victims to cover what they thought would be taxed. The problem? The IRS decided years ago that "non-economic" damages are taxable. This will most likely unfortunately result in more time and money being spent to clear up an already decided issue. Whose time and money? Yours!

· Yet another portion of the reform measures eliminates a long-standing doctrine called "joint and several liability." Under the old rule, if more than one person was responsible for your injuries, you could recover 100% against each of them. This doctrine was based upon the idea that people should be responsible for their own actions. The new law abolishes this doctrine. Now, if more than one person causes your injuries, the jury must decide what percentage of the injuries each wrongdoer caused and they are only responsible for that portion.

As often seems to be the case, the legislature may have caused as many problems as it set out to resolve. Different cases will be affected in different ways by the nuances and exceptions to the new measures. If you have questions about an injury or about how the new laws may affect your claim, feel free to call us at 405-217-4118.

New Oklahoma Law Stiffens DUI Penalties

Oklahoma driving laws were recently updated, severely increasing penalties and extending punishment time periods. Senate Bill 529, or the Erin Elizabeth Swezey Act, was signed into law by Governor Mary Fallin and went into effect the first of November 2011. The drunk driving measure comes as a direct response to an Oklahoma State University student who was killed by a drunk driver in 2009. Erin Elizabeth Swezey was struck head-on by a pickup traveling the wrong way on the Kilpatrick Turnpike. The driver, a repeat DUI offender, had a blood alcohol content level of 0.29% and was traveling nearly 100 miles per hour.

The new law, passed 45-0 by the state Senate, requires all drivers required to install an ignition interlock device to post "INTERLOCK REQUIRED" on their drivers license while the device is in place. Further changes include:

· 1st time offenders with a blood alcohol content of 0.15% or those who refuse to submit to a test to install an ignition interlock device for at least18 months

· 2nd time offenders must have the interlock device for a minimum of 4 years

· 3rd time and subsequent offenders are forced to install the device for no less 5 years.

Other seemingly small changes can greatly affect a particular situation. If you have questions consult our website, e-mail us, or feel free to call us at 866-636-2486 and talk to one of our experienced criminal defense attorneys.

Welcome to Our Norman, Oklahoma, Personal Injury and Criminal Defense Blog

When you face an important legal challenge or decision, a focused, knowledgeable lawyer can be of great assistance and protect your rights. The Oklahoma state and federal legal systems can be intimidating, with unique rules and languages of their own. An attorney who understands all factors important to your case can help you evaluate options and take the best available action for your future.

At Nichols Law Firm, with offices in Norman and Wewoka to serve clients throughout the Oklahoma City area and statewide, experienced former Cleveland County prosecutors adeptly handle personal injury claims, DUI defense, misdemeanor and felony criminal defense, divorce, family law representation and more.

Contact our office by e-mail or call us at 405-217-4118 to discuss your needs and goals with an attorney.

Our Oklahoma Personal Injury and Criminal Defense Blog

We established this blog primarily to provide valuable information to people injured in accidents or facing criminal charges in the Norman and Oklahoma City areas and throughout the state. We will post entries on a wide range of legal topics, including car accidents, insurance claims, evolving DUI laws, criminal expungements and more

We welcome your participation in the discussions on this blog. Feel free to comment on posts that interest you.

It's important to note that the stories and cases reported on this blog are not meant to implicitly or explicitly depict cases actively handled by our firm. In most cases, the blog will simply cover cases similar to those we are interested in handling.

Contact Our Office

Contact us by e-mail or call us at 405-217-4118 for more information. 

Posts/Categories Tell Us About Your Case

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
FindLaw Network

Privacy Policy | FirmSite® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.